http://www.facebook.com/myrecap
the content here is not actively updated anymore, please visit my facebook page where I keep my digital sharing.
http://www.facebook.com/myrecap
the content here is not actively updated anymore, please visit my facebook page where I keep my digital sharing.
Posted in digital
Background
We’re working in digital marketing industry, from time to time, we always need to hire freelancer/temp or even perm, no matter creative, AS, programmer, whatever, when we need it, we just need it urgently. So how we did in the past, except source from headhunt, we post it on msn, ask people around, but the most effective way is posting on facebook, it makes no surprise, you have your ad industry network at Facebook.
Create a Facebook Group
So it makes perfect sense to create a Facebook group for HK ad industry people, it’s easy and anyone can did it in 1 min. There’re differences between Page & Group which you can google about it, but the main difference to me is Page = 1 to many; Group = many to many. So in this case, should be a group. I think what we need to be cautious is the NAME, which is a critical factor whether or not people will join the group, it should be PRECISE, DIRECT, and most importantly, show an attitude if possible, let’s look at a few possible naming in my mind:
1) 廣告界 freelancers: too generic, not precise, not showing the role/action 搵工, 請人
2) 廣告界: 搵工, 請人 join this group: show the action which is quite good, but not having an attitude
3) 廣告界: 搵工, 請人 DIY: i nearly used this but i think it’s too 老士
4) 廣告界: 搵工, 請人, Facebook係最快的: i think this is the best coz people who join must agree Facebook is effective, so it clearly tells the role and why Facebook, so that’s my final decision, struggling just for a few minutes though.
Then it’s the description, it’s still important coz the name, description are all the words you can put there. It has to be precise & direct too, I tend to add a next step so it makes more actionable right, and maybe point-form is easier to read so this comes up in another few minutes:
廣告界:
無論 ATL/BTL/Digital
無論 temp/freelance/perm
無論 巿好巿壞
經常都要請人
有見及此, 特開此group, 惠澤社群
請人的: please make a new post
搵工的: please reply (maybe as an inbox msg?), or post yourself
I still need a profile pic for the group, I tried to do a search at getty but I guess staged photo is probably not for a facebook group as it’s more casual, and I won’t pay for it of course. Then I look for more lifestyle photo at google, I searched 打工 and finally got the current one, it might not be the best but anyway, i just do it for fun only.
Becoming Viral
I setup this group at 1pm on 28 Dec, I sent the group to maybe 1X friends in my msn list, and one of my colleague blasted approx 50 invitations on Facebook, that’s all we actively did. After all it’s all organic growth, the rate is:
in 3 hours: 100 members
in 12 hours: 1,000 members
in 24 hours: 2,000 members
in 36 hours: 3,000 members
until now, ard 48 hours: 3,707 members
so almost 1,000 members per 12 hour
The result to me is of course amazing, I’d never imagine there’re so many people joining and growing so fast. But yeah it’s not difficult to understand when sth meets the needs of a specific target audience group in a viral-able medium, it can grow much faster than you expect.
and funnily enough someone start to add me or send me message looking for jobs, though i don’t mind to help if there’s any.
so this is my best personal project so far, other than the 1 million click projects where we gathered 1 million clicks in less than 1 month!
http://media.sunfffd.hk/click/
oh, how fast he left the Dachis group
sad to see he has yet to revolutionize the so-called revolutionary category
so how will the PR digital arm challenge with the traditional digital unit?
http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2009/12/edelman-1.html
I said google won’t let it grow!!!
https://myrecap.wordpress.com/2009/06/21/the-next-google/
finally Google acqurie admob, what a good news
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/investing-in-mobile-future-with-admob.html
perhaps this gives you more clues on Windows 7 launch party
well, but the windows 7 launch party is still to stupid to watch it over again
here with buzz report comment’s
Facebook page is becoming a standard to brands
Molecular Voices has an article about its advantages & disadvantages
and here’s 10 Successful Facebook business pages
well, talking about social media case, you must bookmark the link below
1) Peter Kim’s list of Social Media Marketing example
2) Super list: 23 Extensive Lists of Organizations Using Social Media
I guess with the links above, you’ll find lots of facebook pages example and social media marketing examples
Everybrand should has its own facebook fan page
the problem is everyone like you and me can open one
so how to prove the authenticity?
I guess this will be an annoying problem like the domain registration
but since $$ can settle the domain problem
it can’t settle the facebook fans, in which you can’t just migrate the unofficial fans to official fans
that’d be a problem
anyway facebook has a new authentication policy on facebook page
it’s a good measure except requiring you to put “badge/share” widget on the official site
there’s a good article in inside facebook you might want to read
well, afterall, you might also visit my page on facebook, become a fan
http://www.facebook.com/myrecap
what’s more exciting than the term user-generated mix with the term augmented reality
or whatever you call the “new AR”, “2d sketches become 3d reality”, “Sketch & Shape recognition”, “in place 3D sketching”
they’re technical terms, what’s really meaning to the market, the marketing term, is the “user-generated AR”
Hats off to the folks from the Visual Media Lab at Ben Gurion University and HIT Lab NZ, they have “jail-breaked?” the iPhone to release let anyone perform on-the-fly analysis of live streaming video on the iPhone.
what it means to agency/marketers is, we don’t need to print out something, or take it from magazine to visualize the 3D, just for the sake of seeing the little funny meaningless cutie 3D object, we can just draw on it, isn’t it cool?
(be patience, watch it till the end)
reference:
http://gamesalfresco.com/2009/10/16/2d-sketches-become-3d-reality/
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_augmented_reality_hack.php
Online PR/Forum posting/Blogger endorsement, we find bloggers for product trial/to endorse the product, we post messages on forum to promote the product
personally i don’t like brands/agency to communicate in this way
FTC recently regulates the rule on Endorsement & Testimonials, and the rules has extended to social media the first time, which is a big milestone on regulating this virgin land.
I truly welcome this rule, let’s utilize the social media in a right way instead of treating this as another push advertising channel.
The Federal Trade Commission is cracking down on blogger payola.
The agency, which protects consumers from fraud or deceptive business practices, voted 4 to 0 to update its rules governing endorsements, and the new guidelines require bloggers to clearly disclose any “material connection” to an advertiser, including payments for an endorsement or free product.
It’s the first time since 1980 that the FTC has updated its rules on the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising. In addition to covering bloggers, the new FTC rules state that celebrity endorsers can be held liable for false statements about a product, and all endorsements must include results consumers can “generally expect.” Previously, an advertiser could cover their claims by the disclaimer “results not typical.”
http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=139457
Update on 13 Oct
Advertising Age has 3 articles to talk about this, see how important it is.
Andy Sernovitz welcomes the new rule
There’s not a single new rule in the FTC announcement. Fake endorsements have always been illegal. In traditional advertising, you wouldn’t dare suggest to your boss or client that you pay off reporters or hiring actors to give fake testimonials. (You’d be fired.) So how did we think the same thing was OK just because it’s social media?
and he points out a very important point that “Remember: This is the law, not a matter of opinion or debate among social media experts.”
Dan Gillmore thinks this is a government gone wild policy
First, the new system is unworkable in practice, which is bad enough. Worse, the rules are worryingly vague and wide-ranging. Worse yet, they appear to give traditional print and broadcast journalists a pass while applying harsh regulations to bloggers (and others using conversational media of various kinds). Worst and most important, they are, in the end, an attack on markets and free speech, based on a 20th Century notion of media and advertising that simply doesn’t map to the new era.
Dan worries about the implementation, the workability, the vague area between the regulation. I think even it’s not that workable, it’s a nice rule to have 阻嚇性. We don’t need a team of internet police to check the messages everyday, but when a complain is received, at least we have a rule to deal with it.
Then we have a FAQ article to the new rule, really useful.
Again, I truly welcome this new policy, even though workability is an issue, I think the official will have further supplement on it, but at least it’s a great start. But well, I don’t think we’ll have this rule in HK, it’s still a virgin land to brand! not a good news at all.